Udemy

Practice Exams: AWS Machine Learning Engineer Associate Cert

Enroll Now
  • 12,048 Students
  • Updated 7/2025
4.6
(732 Ratings)
CTgoodjobs selects quality courses to enhance professionals' competitiveness. By purchasing courses through links on our site, we may receive an affiliate commission.

Course Information

Registration period
Year-round Recruitment
Course Level
Study Mode
Duration
0 Hour(s) 0 Minute(s)
Language
English
Taught by
Stephane Maarek | AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner,Solutions Architect,Developer, Abhishek Singh
Rating
4.6
(732 Ratings)

Course Overview

Practice Exams: AWS Machine Learning Engineer Associate Cert

Prepare for AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer Associate. 195 high-quality test questions and detailed explanations

Preparing for AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer - Associate (MLA-C01)? This is THE practice exams course to give you the winning edge.

These practice exams have been co-authored by Stephane Maarek and Abhishek Singh who bring their collective experience of passing 20 AWS Certifications to the table.

Why Serious Learners Choose These Practice Exams

  • Human-crafted, exam-aware questions backed by real AWS expertise
    Every item is designed by an instructor with deep, hands-on AWS experience and insight into how AWS actually tests concepts, not mass-generated by generic AI tools.

  • Authentic exam feel with blueprint-aligned difficulty and distractors
    Questions mirror the tone, complexity, and trap patterns used in actual certification exams, helping learners build confidence under realistic conditions.

  • Enhanced with diagrams, flows, and AWS-doc-based explanations
    Answers include visually rich explanations, custom diagrams, and carefully written descriptions distilled from official AWS documentation.

  • Updated to reflect real-world patterns and the latest AWS services
    Content stays aligned with how AWS evolves its exams, focusing on the topics and service combinations most likely to appear in current and upcoming versions.

  • Designed to build actual problem-solving skill, not just memorization
    Scenarios train reasoning across architectures, security, data, and ML patterns, preparing learners to think like ML Engineers instead of guessing. Do not just ace the exam, become a stronger AWS Professional.


We want you to think of this course as the final pit-stop so that you can cross the winning line with absolute confidence and get AWS Certified! Trust our process, you are in good hands.


Quality speaks for itself:

SAMPLE QUESTION:

You are working as a data scientist at a financial services company tasked with developing a credit risk prediction model. After experimenting with several models, including logistic regression, decision trees, and support vector machines, you find that none of the models individually achieves the desired level of accuracy and robustness. Your goal is to improve overall model performance by combining these models in a way that leverages their strengths while minimizing their weaknesses.

Given the scenario, which of the following approaches is the MOST LIKELY to improve the model’s performance?


1. Use a simple voting ensemble, where the final prediction is based on the majority vote from the logistic regression, decision tree, and support vector machine models

2. Implement boosting by training sequentially different types of models - logistic regression, decision trees, and support vector machines - where each new model corrects the errors of the previous ones

3. Apply stacking, where the predictions from logistic regression, decision trees, and support vector machines are used as inputs to a meta-model, such as a random forest, to make the final prediction

4. Use bagging, where different types of models - logistic regression, decision trees, and support vector machines - are trained on different subsets of the data, and their predictions are averaged to produce the final result


What's your guess? Scroll below for the answer.














Correct: 3

Explanation:

Correct option:

Apply stacking, where the predictions from logistic regression, decision trees, and support vector machines are used as inputs to a meta-model, such as a random forest, to make the final prediction

In bagging, data scientists improve the accuracy of weak learners by training several of them at once on multiple datasets. In contrast, boosting trains weak learners one after another.

Stacking involves training a meta-model on the predictions of several base models. This approach can significantly improve performance because the meta-model learns to leverage the strengths of each base model while compensating for their weaknesses.

For the given use case, leveraging a meta-model like a random forest can help capture the relationships between the predictions of logistic regression, decision trees, and support vector machines.


<Solution reference image>

<via - reference link>


Incorrect options:

Use a simple voting ensemble, where the final prediction is based on the majority vote from the logistic regression, decision tree, and support vector machine models - A voting ensemble is a straightforward way to combine models, and it can improve performance. However, it typically does not capture the complex interactions between models as effectively as stacking.

Implement boosting by training sequentially different types of models - logistic regression, decision trees, and support vector machines - where each new model corrects the errors of the previous ones - Boosting is a powerful technique for improving model performance by training models sequentially, where each model focuses on correcting the errors of the previous one. However, it typically involves the same base model, such as decision trees (e.g., XGBoost), rather than combining different types of models.

Use bagging, where different types of models - logistic regression, decision trees, and support vector machines - are trained on different subsets of the data, and their predictions are averaged to produce the final result - Bagging, like boosting, is effective for reducing variance and improving the stability of models, particularly for high-variance models like decision trees. However, it usually involves training multiple instances of the same model type (e.g., decision trees in random forests) rather than combining different types of models.


<With multiple reference links from AWS documentation>


Instructor

My name is Stéphane Maarek, I am passionate about Cloud Computing, and I will be your instructor in this course. I teach about AWS certifications, focusing on helping my students improve their professional proficiencies in AWS.

I have already taught 2,500,000+ students and gotten 800,000+ reviews throughout my career in designing and delivering these certifications and courses!

I'm delighted to welcome Abhishek Singh as my co-instructor for these practice exams!



Welcome to the best practice exams to help you prepare for your AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer - Associate exam.

  • You can retake the exams as many times as you want

  • This is a huge original question bank

  • You get support from instructors if you have questions

  • Each question has a detailed explanation

  • Mobile-compatible with the Udemy app

  • 30-days money-back guarantee if you're not satisfied

We hope that by now you're convinced! And there are a lot more questions inside the course.

Happy learning and best of luck for your AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer - Associate exam!

Course Content

  • 1 section(s)
  • Section 1 Practice Tests

What You’ll Learn

  • Guaranteed chance to pass the exam if you score 90%+ on each practice exam
  • Ace your AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer - Associate (MLA-C01) exam
  • Practice with high quality practice exams alongside detailed explanation to learn concepts
  • The MLA-C01 practice exams have been written from scratch


Reviews

  • K
    Kong Phui Ng
    3.0

    many of the multiple choice answers are very obviously incorrect, it does not challenge the learner's understanding of AWS Machine Learning but more like a test in English comprehension skill.

  • E
    Ephraim uche
    4.0

    The questions gave me a good idea of how the question will be like. My advice would be to read thoroughly on each topic you fail. Know differences, as those questions come out alot. Some questions repeated but I think there are new and fresh questions in the main exam. Overall this gave me a firm and broad understading of what TYPE of questions to expect!

  • J
    Jonas B.
    2.0

    Bloated and over-priced set of three practice exams. Cons: - Many nonsense or poor quality questions. Examples: 1) A question mentions three models, but then you have to select two answers, so one model does not appear in the answers. Very weird. 2) A question asks to balance risks associated with false positives and false negatives: Correct answer is to prioritize recall metric, so apparently 'balancing' means one type of error is more serious?? 3) Question asks for examples of supervised learning: 'Neural network' is a correct answer, but 'document classification' isn't. Interesting... - Answer explanations often very vague, e.g. like "this may not resolve the issue". Yeah sure, it may not, but sometimes it may do, so how does this explain anything? - Students asked questions about the points I just mentioned, but no one answered and nothing was changed. Pros: - Some questions are very similar to the ones in the real exam. - Prepares you for weird and imprecise questions which also appear in the real exam.

  • V
    Viktor Nesovski
    3.0

    There is a clear disparity between the learning material and the tests. The material needs to go more in depth for the questions to be answerable on the first try.

Start FollowingSee all

We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. Please read and confirm your agreement to our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions before continue to browse our website.

Read and Agreed