課程資料
課程簡介
Deep dive into state machines, Finite automata, and Regular expressions
Course overview
State machines — the fundamental concept used today in many practical applications, starting from UI programming like React, automated reply systems, lexical analysis in parsers and formal language theory — i.e. the RegExp machines, — and up to real life use cases, such as simple traffic lights, vending machines, and others.
The state machines are backed by the larger theoretical field of computer science known as Theory of Computation, and also by its direct theoretical model — the Automata Theory.
In this class we study the Automata Theory on the practical example of implementing a Regular Expressions machine.
Why to take this class?
It’s not a secret, that big tech companies, such as Google, Facebook, etc. organize their recruiting process around generalist engineers, which understand basic fundamental systems, data structures, and algorithms. In fact, it’s a known issue in tech-recruiting: there are a lot of “programmers”, but not so many “engineers”. And what does define an “engineer” in this case? — an ability so solve complex problems, with understanding (and experience) in those generic concepts.
And there is a simple trick how you can gain a great experience with transferable knowledge to other systems. — You take some complex theoretical field, which might not (yet) be related to your main job, and implement it in a language you’re familiar with. And while you build it, you learn all the different data structures and algorithms, which accommodate this system. It should specifically be something generic (for example, State machines), so you can further transfer this knowledge to your “day-to-day” job.
In this class we take this approach. To study Automata “Theory” we make it more practical: we take one of its widely-used applications, the lexical analysis, and pattern matching, and build a RegExp machine.
Not only we’ll completely understand how the Regular Expressions work under the hood (and what will make their usage more professional), but also will be able to apply this knowledge about formal grammars, languages, finite automata — NFAs, DFAs, etc — in other fields of our work.
Who this class is for?
For any curious engineer willing to gain a generic knowledge about Finite Automata and Regular Expressions.
Notice though, that this class is not about how to use regular expressions (you should already know what a regular expression is, and actively use it on practice as a prerequisite for this class), but rather about how to implement the regular expressions — again with the goal to study generic complex system.
In addition, the lexical analysis (NFAs and DFAs specifically) is the basis for the parsers theory. So if you want to understand how parsers work (and more specifically, their Tokenizer or “Lexer” module), you can start here too. The path for a compiler engineer starts exactly from the Finite automata and lexical analyzer.
What are the features of this class?
The main features of these lectures are:
Concise and straight to the point. Each lecture is self-contained, concise, and describes information directly related to the topic, not distracting on unrelated materials or talks.
Animated presentation combined with live-editing notes. This makes understanding of the topics easier, and shows how (and when at time) the object structures are connected. Static slides simply don’t work for a complex content!
What is in the course?
The course is divided into three parts, in total of 16 lectures, and many sub-topics in each lecture. Below is the table of contents and curriculum.
Part 1: Formal grammars and Automata
In this part we discuss the history of State machines, and Regular expressions, talk about Formal grammars in Language theory. We also consider different types of Finite automata, understanding the differences between NFA, ε-NFA, and DFA.
Part 2: RegExp NFA fragments
In this part we focus on the main NFA fragments, the basic building blocks used in RegExp automata. We study how by using generic principle of composition, we can obtain very complex machines, and also to optimize them.
Part 3: RegExp machine
Finally, we implement an actual test method of regular expressions which transit from state to state, matching a string. First we understand how an NFA acceptor works by traversing the graph. Then we transform it into an NFA table, and eventually to a DFA table. We also talk and describe in detail DFA minimization algorithm.
I hope you’ll enjoy the class, and will be glad to discuss any questions and suggestion in comments.
Sincerely,
Dmitry Soshnikov
課程章節
- 3 個章節
- 16 堂課
- 第 1 章 Formal grammars and Finite automata
- 第 2 章 RegExp NFA fragments
- 第 3 章 RegExp machine
課程內容
- Theory of Computation
- State machines / Finite automata
- NFA and DFA
- Automata Theory
- Build a full RegExp machine
- Graphs, traversal, states and transitions
評價
-
CChristian Egli
Excellently structured. Great exercises. Learnt a lot
-
LLeo Unglaub
I usually really like the author and his way of explaining stuff. However this one is strange, because it feels like a speedrun to be done as fast as possible. This is around 2 hours and it shows. Entire topics that should be its own lecture are done in 1-2 sentences. There is no solution to the code homework (i like the fact that we have to do it ourself, but maybe have a video at the end where you go over a possible solution or so) The thing thats missing the most is an answer to the question "why". Why is a NFA Table better than the graph? Why is an DFA Table better? It is just presented as something you have todo without explaining it. The course also states that there are only 5 building blocks needed for regular expressions to work, however stuff like lookahead/lookbehind feels impossible to do. There is also no talk about getting from an actual regular expression to the implementation. Should the string be parsed into an AST? What would a tokenizer look for this? With this course you get a lot of knowledge on how a regex might work, but its not really tied together.
-
ZZhangmingzhe
it was a excellent course, but e-NFA to NFA , NFA to DFA convert part explain were too short for me, I need take another course and chatgpt to teach myself. I love the teacher style. it was a clean and concise course , not like other teacher, they talk too much on not important information.
-
EEmre
What's presented is good but it feels like the lecturer is trying to speedrun the presentation to under 2hrs. It could've been expanded much more and it would've been an excellent, 5 star, tutorial had the lecturer done so.